Case study structuring

What was done, and
what did not work.

Raw material becomes a case study structure: background, approach, results, limits, and open items. No invented client names, industries, sizes, or percentage results; missing figures stay as placeholders and nothing unsuccessful is recast as a win.

Traceable figuresGaps stay gapsFailure stated plainly
01

Paste raw material

0 / 12,000 charactersMinimum 80

Content is used only for this AI request and is not intentionally stored by this site.

02

Review the draft

Your result will appear here

We trace what happened, isolate every result figure, and list the missing numbers and client permissions you need before publishing.

SAMPLE OUTPUT

Here is exactly what you receive.

This is the complete output for the material in the demo above: a completeness score, itemised improvements, items to confirm before publishing, and the case study draft. It is a demonstration, not a customer case.

SAMPLE

Draft result (sample)

Completeness score88/100
+50
01

Split background, approach, and results into sections

The source mixes industry, changes, impressions, and the stalled follow-up into one paragraph. Separate sections let readers judge substance themselves.

02

Mark unmeasured impressions as pending data

“Feels faster” has no corresponding measure. The impression survives, but the results section notes what checkable data is needed instead of converting it into a percentage.

03

Record the stalled rollout under limits

The contact leaving and nothing further shipping is a material constraint. It goes into limits, with a note that this case does not represent long-term results.

Case study draft
# Case study draft

**Background**: client operates in industrial consumables; quotation relied on spreadsheets with calculation rules spread across several files. [TODO: confirm whether the client name may be published]

**Approach**
- Mapped the existing calculation rules and moved them into the system for automated quoting
- Left the client's own formula set untouched so existing results were preserved
- [TODO: add go-live date and roles involved]

**Results**
- Used for roughly three months; users report the flow is smoother than before
- [TODO: the source gives no quantified result; add a checkable metric or drop this section]

**Limits**
- Unmeasured impressions cannot support a performance claim
- The client-side contact has left and rollout stalled, so this case does not represent long-term results

**Pending**: obtain the client's written permission to publish this case.

WHAT DRAFTING DOES

Not promotional copy. An account a reader can judge.

01

Background before action

Without the situation they faced, nothing later has a reference point and no one can gauge difficulty.

02

Keep actions and results apart

Blended together, what was done reads as what it delivered. Almost every case study has this confusion.

03

Mark where each number comes from

“Roughly doubled” and “saved plenty” are not sources. Note where a figure can be checked.

WHY WRITE IT THIS WAY

One undefendable number sinks the whole case.

01

Readers first ask whether they resemble this client

Vague background and the case carries no transferable information — persuasion without substance.

02

The temptation to invent a percentage is strongest here

The results section needs a number, so one appears. The moment someone asks about it, credibility goes with it.

03

The failed parts carry the most information

What was tried and did not work is usually the densest material. Delete it and the case study turns into an ad.

Note: how useful a case study is depends on how closely the reader resembles that client and on how the deployment was run and for how long; there is no general effect benchmark. This site structures and organises wording only. It does not verify figures, does not invent clients, and offers no investment, procurement, or performance advice.

DRAFTING DEMO

The same material, in a form that survives review.

Source material

The client sells industrial consumables. We rebuilt their quotation process, mainly moving calculations out of spreadsheets and into the system. There was one set of formulas they wrote themselves that we did not dare touch, so it stayed. It has been running about three months; people say it feels faster, though I never measured how much. Their main contact recently left, so nothing further was rolled out.

Structured draft
# Case study draft

**Background**: client operates in industrial consumables; quotation relied on spreadsheets with calculation rules spread across several files. [TODO: confirm whether the client name may be published]

**Approach**
- Mapped the existing calculation rules and moved them into the system for automated quoting
- Left the client's own formula set untouched so existing results were preserved
- [TODO: add go-live date and roles involved]

**Results**
- Used for roughly three months; users report the flow is smoother than before
- [TODO: the source gives no quantified result; add a checkable metric or drop this section]

**Limits**
- Unmeasured impressions cannot support a performance claim
- The client-side contact has left and rollout stalled, so this case does not represent long-term results

**Pending**: obtain the client's written permission to publish this case.

Demo sample: background separated from results, unmeasured impressions marked as needing data, and the stalled rollout stated as a limit. Paste your material to get your version (sign-in required; one credit per run).

WHY YOU CAN TRUST IT

We put “no invented percentages” into our product principles.

Client details are never invented

Names, industries, sizes, regions, and contacts are reproduced as supplied. Anything absent becomes a confirmation item rather than a plausible filler.

Missing results stay missing

With no metric supplied, the draft says so and notes what would be needed. It never produces a convenient “about thirty percent better”.

Failures are not retold as wins

Stalled rollouts, weak outcomes, or approaches that were rejected go into limits or open items exactly as described.

Content is not stored

Submitted text is used for this single AI request and is not intentionally persisted. See the Privacy Policy.

FAQ

Ask these before you pay.

Can I write a case with no quantified results?

Yes. The results section states that the source provides none and notes what measures would be needed, rather than supplying numbers for you.

What if the project did not succeed?

It is written as it happened. Stalled or partial outcomes go into limits or open items instead of being reframed as a success.

Can the client stay anonymous?

Yes. Without permission we describe in brackets what may be disclosed, and list written clearance as a confirmation item.

What does one draft cost?

One credit per run, usually done in seconds, returning the draft, the reasoning, and items to confirm.

Do credits expire?

No. Credits never expire — whatever you do not use carries over to the next cycle instead of resetting.

Is there batch processing or an API?

Not yet. Each run processes one document and consumes one credit; there is no bulk upload or API today. Email us with your use case and we will assess it.

Is my content stored?

Not intentionally. Text is used for this single AI request only. See the Privacy Policy.

Which material fits?

Debrief notes, interview transcripts, chat excerpts, delivery summaries, collected client feedback — any raw material describing one real engagement.

SIMPLE PRICING

Prove the value before you upgrade.

Starter

$9/ month

For an occasional publishing cadence, with a focused monthly credit allocation.

  • 50 optimization credits per monthly renewal
  • Complete GEO analysis
  • Chinese and English output
  • Markdown export

Advanced

$79/ month

Our largest monthly credit allocation, for the heaviest continuous usage.

  • 1,000 optimization credits per monthly renewal
  • Complete GEO analysis
  • Chinese and English output
  • Markdown export
Loading localized prices

Credits never expire: unused credits carry over instead of resetting. Credits apply to this site only and are not shared with other sites.

Prices shown are USD baselines; final currency, taxes, and discounts are determined by Paddle for the checkout location.